DescriptionThis research article, authored by Innes and colleagues, from 2019, focuses on the UK, to examine the resistance to the UK's Prevent counter-terrorism strategy in the context of ongoing debates about its legitimacy and efficacy. It analyses how this resistance manifests, particularly after terror events, using data from interviews with policy developers and social media assessments following four attacks in 2017. The article highlights that these incidents underscore the necessity for Prevent interventions while also revealing their failures to prevent violence. A key theme is the management of public perceptions amidst rumours and disinformation, which is crucial for reputational maintenance. The insights gained inform a broader argument about the logics of ‘counter-governance’ within the context of de-centred governance and regulation.Related topicLocal Dimension, Polarisation, and Resilience BuildingLinkRead the document